Iran says it's ready to negotiate on its contentious nuclear program, but questions abound over Tehran's domestic politics and what confidence-building measures the West and Iran can agree upon.
We are Veronica Smith and Chris Metzner. Veronica is principal of data2insight, an evaluation and research firm with data visualization expertise and Chris Metzner is a freelance graphic designer.
Matt Keene and Chris created the popular fuzzy logic model for the Oregon Paint Stewardship Pilot Program. The fuzzy logic model concept (FLM) evolved out of the desire to make the traditional logic model dynamic, non-linear and stakeholder-friendly. This logic model embraces fluid and approximate reasoning and provides an evaluation reporting framework.
We provide tips, tricks and resources for illustrating and disseminating your FLM.
Illustration
Rad Resources: Creating a FLM begins with a sketch of the theory of action and theory of change (get out your pencil and paper!). Once finalized, it’s time to digitize. For DIY’ers, we recommend OmniGraffle 5 Professional ($199.99), Adobe Illustrator CS5 ($599.00) or DoView ($79.95).
OmniGraffle offers quick page-layout design and is great for Mac users. DoView turns outcome models into user-friendly web pages. Adobe Illustrator is the graphic design industry standard. It allows total control over the project and is a complex tool.
Hot Tip: Hiring a graphic designer can cost can anywhere from $60-100/hour. You save time when the designer translates your sketch into an illustration tailored to stakeholders’ needs using sound visual design principles. The illustration for the Oregon paint program (above) would cost somewhere between $2000-3500.
Dissemination
Rad Resources: With a digital illustration you are ready to get online. First, purchase a domain name ($12.99/yr) and hosting plan ($6.99/yr). We recommend DreamHost or Hostmonster.
If your FLM doesn’t require advanced user interaction, purchase a pre-built website from the hosting company. WordPress, free software installed by your host company is another option. WordPress offers easy blog creation and site-enhancing plugins, but requires basic web development knowledge. Apply a theme to give your website for a professional look. Using Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 ($399.00) is for someone with advanced website coding knowledge.
Hot Tip: You can also hire a designer to bring the FLM to life. A web designer will charge $100-150/hour. Meet with the designer and communicate your goals in order to get a cost estimate for website creation. A designer can create a site for as little as $1000. The value add of a good designer is the expertise to secure the website, monitor traffic and optimize content for search engines. Website design costs can be offset by time and money saved disseminating results electronically.
Beyond the basics
Cool Trick: Employ social media and video technologies to increase stakeholder engagement and evaluation use.
Run with it
FLM opens the door for enhanced stakeholder engagement, reporting, results dissemination and evidence-based decision making. Let us know how you use FLMs to meet your client needs.
We’re celebrating Data Visualization and Reporting Week with our colleagues in the DVR AEA Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our DVR members and you may wish to consider subscribing to our weekly headlines and resources list where we’ll be highlighting DVR resources. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice.
Related posts:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave these remarks on 'jobs diplomacy' on February 21, 2012 in Washington DC, at the Global Business Conference.
I’m Johanna Morariu, a Director at Innovation Network, an evaluation consulting firm that works with nonprofit organizations and foundations.
Rad Resources: I want to share two extremely useful network analysis and mapping tools: Gephi and NodeXL. I use NodeXL for collecting, organizing, and analyzing network data and Gephi for attractively presenting sociograms or network maps.
In a past post, Shelly Engelman and Tom McKlin introduced NodeXL when they wrote about assessing the evolution of Social Networks Using NodeXL. In addition to the functionality they discussed, NodeXL can also be used to collect social network data from Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and email, and NodeXL can open/read other network analysis file formats. (And with the recently released Social Network Importer, you can also work with Facebook social networks.) But for all its strengths and utility, the network maps that can be made in NodeXL leave something to be desired.
Lessons Learned: Visually observing network structural features is a critical component of network analysis. And for evaluation stakeholders to effectively discern features, it is important to create well-designed network maps—and that is exactly what Gephi does!
Gephi allows for unprecedented control and options while creating network maps. For example, groups of network nodes can be coded by color, or degree can be represented by increasing node size. Gephi also has the capacity to incorporate longitudinal data, to show changes over time.
Since a picture is worth a thousand words, here is the progression from NodeXL to Gephi drawn from a twitter search of the hashtag #eval on January 17, 2011.
First, the basic NodeXL map:
After exporting the data from NodeXL to a GraphML file, uploading to Gephi, and tweaking, here is the new map:
And with another simple change (turning on automatic resizing by node degree), voilà!
Rad Resources: And since this is the DVRTIG week, I can’t help but share three other essential tools for creating visually appealing presentations:
Rad Resources: Interested in learning more about network analysis? Check out these great posts:
We’re celebrating Data Visualization and Reporting Week with our colleagues in the DVR AEA Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our DVR members and you may wish to consider subscribing to our weekly headlines and resources list where we’ll be highlighting DVR resources. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice.
Related posts:
Oh, hi. I’m Stephanie Evergreen and I’m in love with data visualization and reporting (DVR). I blog about DVR, I tweet about DVR, and sometimes I even dream about DVR. I was in love with DVR at first sight so I’m here to tell you what you can do when you realize you, too, have got it bad.
Lessons Learned:
The signs you’re in love:
Hot tips: Now what can you do with all that attractive energy?
We’re celebrating Data Visualization and Reporting Week with our colleagues in the DVR AEA Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our DVR members and you may wish to consider subscribing to our weekly headlines and resources list where we’ll be highlighting DVR resources. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice.
Related posts:
Our names are Amy Germuth and Johanna Morariu and we are proud to serve as the Chair and Co-Chair of the Data Visualization and Reporting TIG. Although this TIG started just last year we already have multiple members working to entice the AEA community to better communicate using infographics and data visualizations. We hope you will join us in considering how graphic representations of data and visual communication can improve stakeholder engagement, understanding, and support at all levels of an evaluation.
Hot Tip: From Inspired Magazine: 20 Essential Infographic and Data Visualization Blogs. While some are merely eye candy, others are the real deal and show data in new and meaningful ways.
Rad Resource: Did you know that the DVRTIG website is chock full of links to powerful, amazing visualization tools and resources? The TIG resources area of the website contains helpful information such as upcoming DVRTIG sponsored Coffee Break Webinars, blogs, visualization tools, and examples.
Rad Resource: Don’t forget to search the AEA Library for DVRTIG resources!
Hot Tip: Find your cool! If what we presented intrigues you, consider joining the TIG. AEA members can select to join up to 5 TIGs. To join DVRTIG, login to www.eval.org. Then, under the Members Only tab, select Update My Profile. In your profile, you simply check the box next to our TIG’s name. That’s it! You’re a member!
The DVRTIG was started because it is increasingly clear that evaluators will have to be more creative in our communications if we want our findings to be heard and used. Our goal is to bring together a network of like-minded evaluators who can support each other—and the broader AEA community—in such efforts. This week of DVRTIG blogging on aea365 is one such effort. Please be on the lookout for more from us throughout the year, including information about the second ever Ignite AEA (which also serves as our business meeting), to be held at this year’s conference (Minneapolis, MN, October 22-27, 2012).
We’re celebrating Data Visualization and Reporting Week with our colleagues in the DVR AEA Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our DVR members and you may wish to consider subscribing to our weekly headlines and resources list where we’ll be highlighting DVR resources. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice.
Related posts:
I’m Susan Kistler, the American Evaluation Association’s Executive Director. Once each year I write explicitly to those of you who are not AEA members in hopes of encouraging you to join the association.
Hot Tip – Join AEA: Membership in AEA is only $80 per year, $60 if your primary membership is with the Canadian Evaluation Society, or $30 if you are a full-time student. It quickly pays for itself. You can join online.
Hot Tip – AEA members have access to four of the leading evaluation journals: As a member, you’ll receive hardcopy and electronic subscriptions to AEA’s own journals, The American Journal of Evaluation and New Directions for Evaluation, as well as electronic access to Evaluation Review and Evaluation and the Health Professions. You’ll receive not only the latest articles, but also access to 20+ years of archival content.
Hot Tip – AEA members can attend over 40 free Coffee Break Demonstrations each year: And, members can access the recordings in the members-only Coffee Break Archive. Want to get a taste for them? Check out the list of upcoming CBDs as well as the public list of those that are already in the archives.
Hot Tip – AEA members receive discounts on professional development (online and in person): Full members receive $50 off each one-day workshop, whether offered as an AEA eStudy (David Fetterman is offering Empowerment Evaluation this week; Tom Chapel is offering Intro to Evaluation, and Michelle Kobayashi is offering Survey Development next month) or in-person at the AEA annual conference, where you’ll find over 50 pre- and post-conference workshops.
Hot Tip – AEA members engage with the field’s thought leaders: For one week each month AEA hosts a leader in the field on its members-only Thought Leaders Forum. The discussant shares insights, explores issues, and answers your questions. You can lurk in the background and take it all in, or dive in and discuss. Next up? Gail Barrington in March.
Hot Tip – AEA members promote their business: Whether you are an independent consultant or part of a 100 person firm, AEA membership gives you a free listing of your evaluation-related services in AEA’s Find-an-Evaluator database. Directly accessible from the homepage, the FAE listings are among the most highly used sections of the AEA website.
Hot Tip – AEA members build their professional networks and get questions answered: AEA membership includes membership in up to five of AEA’s 50+ Topical Interest Groups (TIGs), from Data Visualization and Reporting, to Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation, to Independent Consulting, to Quantitative Methods, to Evaluating the Arts and Culture, there is a TIG or two (or five) for everyone.
Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org.
Related posts:
My name is Rafael Monterde-Diaz, and I am an Associate Professor at Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain), where I teach Project Management and Program Evaluation. I blog at EVALUATECA and you can also find me on twitter: @rafa_monty
Rad Resource – EVALUATECA is a blog devoted to evaluation. I try to share events and resources mainly focused on evaluation, but from time to time I also bring tools and approaches from other areas to push collective thinking and innovation in evaluation issues. The blog is entirely written in Spanish. Most of the entries are mainly related (but not exclusively) to International issues and Development Aid.
Hot Tips – favorite posts:
Lessons Learned – why I blog: I started blogging in 2007, when Evaluation was barely present in Internet social networks. I found a big gap in the Spanish speaker’s evaluation community, at that time one could hardly find Web 2.0 sites for discussion and sharing. After four years, I think we still have a low level of exchange in both directions. There are very interesting experiences in the Spanish speaking world that remain unknown in other regions of the world and they could become a very useful input. But I think we also miss discussions that take place at an international level because the information is not in Spanish. EVALUATECA helped me to understand the global dimension of the language of blogs and social networks: they are a privileged way to bring ideas across different cultures.
Lessons Learned: I believe it is important to combine blogging with other networking tools, mixing everything into a daily routine. While mailing lists or forums allow more in-depth discussions, social networks such as Twitter or Facebook help you to find fresh cost-effective information. But be careful! It is very easy to get overloaded and end up paralyzed.
This winter, we’re running a series highlighting evaluators who blog. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.
Related posts:
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney writes that "the character of the Chinese government--one that marries aspects of the free market with suppression of freedom--shouldn't become the norm."
Full report(PDF)
Questionnaire with Findings (PDF)
With President Obama presenting his proposed budget for 2013, the question of how to deal with the Bush-era tax cuts, scheduled to terminate at the end of 2012, is once again on the table.
(Image Credit: David Reber)
The Program for Public Consultation presented a representative sample of Americans with options for dealing with the tax cuts, including--for each option--a description of the budgetary consequences and two strongly-stated arguments in its favor.
In conclusion, seven in ten (71%) favored extending the cuts for income below $250,000. This included 22% who favored extending the cuts for all income levels, as well as 49% who favored limiting the extension to income below $250,000.
A similar margin (73%) favored terminating the cuts for income over $250,000. This included 24% who favored terminating them for all income levels, as well as the 49% who favored terminating them only for income above $250,000.
These positions were relatively consistent regardless of party affiliation. Extending cuts for household income below $250,000 was supported by 74% of Republicans, 65% of Democrats, and 76% of independents. Letting cuts expire for higher incomes was supported by 65% of Republicans, 83% of Democrats, and 67% of independents.
Interestingly, only a third of Republicans (33%) endorsed the position of making the tax cuts permanent at all levels. Among Republicans, having the cuts expire only for high incomes was the most common answer (39%). About as many Republicans (24%) as Democrats (28%) favored having the tax cuts simply expire for all income levels.
The study was conducted by the Program for Public Consultation, a joint program of the Center on Policy Attitudes and the School of Public Affairs at the University of Maryland. "Public consultation" seeks to reveal how the public responds when it hears the kind of information and arguments that policymakers hear when making decisions, thus eliciting a clearer expression of the public's values.
Respondents were also given the opportunity to modify the income threshold for terminating the tax cuts. The $250,000 level proved to be the most popular.
All respondents were asked to choose from three levels--$150,000, $250,000 and $500,000. The $250,000 threshold was the most common answer, with 43% choosing it. A greater number put the threshold to the lower level of $150,000 (28%) than put it at the higher level of $500,000 (23%), though not by a large margin.
There were significant partisan differences. A relatively large 39% of Republicans favored the higher threshold of $500,000, though a majority favored $250,000 or less. A relatively large number of independents (41%) and Democrats (32%) favored the lower threshold of $150,000, but in both cases a majority favored $250,000 or more.
Respondents were also presented, and asked to evaluate, two arguments in favor of each proposal. Almost all arguments were found persuasive by majorities, and by majorities of both parties. "In the public, most people see some validity in a range of different arguments," commented Clay Ramsay, research director. "The fact that people in the study found many arguments persuasive shows they were really deliberating and pondering tradeoffs."
For the most popular position--ending tax cuts only for incomes above $250,000--the strongest argument was based on concerns about reducing demand and hurting the economic recovery: "People with low to middle incomes shouldn't be hit with a tax increase in an economic downturn. If they suddenly have less, this will reduce demand...but this isn't true of the 1-2% with household incomes above $250,000--they aren't going to change their spending because of a tax increase that represents only a small percentage of their overall income." This was found convincing by 73%, including 71% of Republicans, 77% of Democrats, and 69% of independents.
The poll was fielded from December 3 to 9, 2011 with a sample size of 680 respondents. Thus, with a design effect of 1.6431, the margin of error was 4.8%. Please contact PPC if you would like a detailed sample design.
The poll was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel®, a probability-based panel designed to be representative of the U.S. population. Initially, participants are chosen scientifically by a random selection of telephone numbers and residential addresses. Persons in selected households are then invited by telephone or by mail to participate in the web-enabled KnowledgePanel®. For those who agree to participate, but do not already have Internet access, Knowledge Networks provides a laptop and ISP connection. More technical information is available at http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/reviewer-info.html.
I’m Steve Gill, a long-time, independent consultant living in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I’ve been a mental health therapist, community mental health worker, university professor, program evaluator, small business owner, employee training and development specialist, strategic planner, and management/leadership consultant.
Rad Resource – The Performance Improvement Blog: This is my blog. I post once a week about topics related to increasing learning and effectiveness of leaders and managers in all types of organizations. Often these posts are about evaluation and its application to organizational performance improvement.
Hot Tips – favorite posts: Over the past four years, I have written over 345 posts to my blog. Here are five that I think exemplify my writing about evaluation:
Lessons Learned – why I blog: I blog to learn and to facilitate the learning of others. In order to blog, I must stay current on what’s happening in my areas of interest and what’s happening in current events, as well as reflect on what I’m learning from my own consulting practice. I find it very rewarding to engage others in conversations about these reflections and observations. In addition, my blog is like a personal, professional library. When I’m investigating a topic, I start by searching my own blog.
Lessons Learned: The blogosphere is frequented by many people who would rather read anonymously and not engage in public conversation (i.e., post comments). My blog has some regulars who often post comments, but there are many more who read my posts and never comment…and that’s okay.
This winter, we’re running a series highlighting evaluators who blog. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.
Related posts: